Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

ANEES MULLAJI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 8864 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the court that the investigation had been concluded and a final report favorable to them had been submitted, and they wished to withdraw the petition. The Additional Government Advocate for the State raised no objection to the withdrawal. The court considered the parties' statements and found no reason to continue the proceedings. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be dismissed as withdrawn upon the petitioners' request and with no objection from the State

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • criminal miscellaneous
  • High Court
  • procedural dismissal

Judgment

                                              HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                               CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8864 of 2026

                                    Anees Mullaji And 3 Others
                                                                                         .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                    Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                         .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Alok Tripathi, Deepak Kumar Tiwari
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.

                                    Court No. - 48
                                                     HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                     HON'BLE DR. AJAY KUMAR-II, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned AGA for the
                                    State and perused the record.

                                    2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has made
                                    a statement at the Bar that in the instant case, investigation has
                                    already been concluded and final report has been submitted in
                                    favour of the petitioners and as such, he does not intend to further
                                    press this writ petition and seeks to withdraw it.

                                    3. Learned AGA for the State has no objection to the aforesaid
                                    prayer.

                                    4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn.

                                    May 7, 2026
                                    Nadim

                                                                 (Dr. Ajay Kumar-II,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
NADIM ALAM
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.