Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

DILSHADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Dilshad, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 8868 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel, Mohd. Shahibe Alam, informed the Court that the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue the petition and seeks its withdrawal. The State’s Additional Government Advocate (AGA) raised no objection to the withdrawal request. The Court considered whether a petition can be withdrawn at this stage and found no impediment, as the petitioner voluntarily expressed the desire to withdraw and the respondent consented. Consequently, the Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. The order was pronounced on 7 May 2026 by Hon’ble Justices Rajiv Gupta and Dr. Ajay Kumar‑II.

Issues considered

  • Whether a criminal miscellaneous writ petition can be withdrawn by the petitioner after filing and during the pendency of the case.

Subjects

  • withdrawal of petition
  • criminal miscellaneous writ
  • procedural law
  • High Court
  • petition dismissed

Judgment

                                               HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                              CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8868 of 2026

                                    Dilshad
                                                                                                   .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                        Versus
                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                                 .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                    :   Mohd. Shahibe Alam
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                    :   G.A.

                                    Court No. - 48
                                                       HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                       HON'BLE DR. AJAY KUMAR-II, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State and
                                    perused the record.

                                    2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has made a
                                    statement at the Bar that he does not intend to press this petition and seeks to
                                    withdraw it.

                                    3. Learned AGA has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.

                                    4. In view of the above statement, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn.

                                    May 7, 2026
                                    KU
                                                                      (Dr. Ajay Kumar-II,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
KALIM UDDIN SIDDIQUI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.