Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

RAJAT @ SUMIT KUMARversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Rajat @ Sumit Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the investigation. The State's Additional Government Advocate informed the court that the police investigation was complete and the report favored the petitioner. The petitioner’s counsel, while not disputing this, expressed a desire to withdraw the petition. The court considered the petitioner's request to withdraw. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate procedural step when a petitioner seeks to withdraw a criminal miscellaneous writ petition?

Subjects

  • withdrawal of petition
  • criminal miscellaneous writ
  • high court procedure
  • petition dismissed

Judgment

                                                 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                  CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9362 of 2026

                                    Rajat @ Sumit Kumar
                                                                                              .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    The State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                            .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                  :   Manoj Kumar Verma
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                  :   G.A.

                                    Court No. - 48
                                                        HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                        HON'BLE DR. AJAY KUMAR-II, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State and
                                    perused the record.

                                    2. At the very outset, learned AGA has informed that investigation in the
                                    instant case has already been concluded and police report has been
                                    forwarded in favour of the petitioner.

                                    3. Per contra, learned counsel for the petitioner could not dispute the
                                    aforesaid fact but states that he does not want to press this petition and
                                    seeks to withdraw it.

                                    4. In view of the above statement, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn.



                                                                    (Dr. Ajay Kumar-II,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)
                                    May 6, 2026
                                    Dhirendra/




Digitally signed by :-
DHIRENDRA KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.