Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

GAURAV RAIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Gaurav Rai, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 9500 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the petition, stating that the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue it. The Additional Government Advocate (AGA) representing the State of U.P. and others raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court considered the petitioner's request and the lack of opposition, and consequently dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. The order was pronounced by Hon'ble Justices Rajiv Gupta and Dr. Ajay Kumar-II on May 6, 2026.

Issues considered

  • What is the procedure for withdrawing a criminal miscellaneous writ petition after it has been filed?

Subjects

  • withdrawal of writ petition
  • procedural law
  • criminal miscellaneous writ
  • high court

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                               CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9500 of 2026

                                    Gaurav Rai
                                                                                                .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                             .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)               :   Lavkush Kumar Shukla
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)               :   G.A.

                                    Court No. - 48
                                                      HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                      HON'BLE DR. AJAY KUMAR-II, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State and
                                    perused the record.

                                    2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has made a
                                    statement at the bar that he does not intend to press this writ petition and
                                    seeks to withdraw it.

                                    3. Learned AGA has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.

                                    4. In view of the above statement, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn.



                                                                    (Dr. Ajay Kumar-II,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)
                                    May 6, 2026
                                    SFH




Digitally signed by :-
SYED FAHIM HUSAIN
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.