Allahabad High Court
SHANE ALAM @ SHANUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
- Decided
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9599 of 2026
Shane Alam @ Shanu
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pankaj Kumar Tyagi
Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
HON'BLE DR. AJAY KUMAR-II, J.
1. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has made
a statement at the Bar that he does not want to press this writ petition
and seeks to withdraw it with liberty to file fresh with better
particulars.
2. In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed with the
aforesaid liberty.
3. Certified copy of the impugned F.I.R. be returned back to learned
counsel for the petitioner as per Rules.
May 7, 2026
R
(Dr. Ajay Kumar-II,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)
Digitally signed by :-
RAM ASARE MORYA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…