Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

JUVENILE X THRU. HIS FATHERversusSTATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER

Decided
Disposal
Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted

Holding

The revision petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

Juvenile X, through his father, filed a criminal revision petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging a decision of the State of Uttar Pradesh. No counsel appeared from either side when the matter was taken up. The learned Additional Government Advocate represented the State. The court noted that the revision was listed among infructuous cases. Since there was no prosecution of the revision petition, the court dismissed it for want of prosecution. The dismissal was recorded and the case was consigned to the record.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate disposition of a revision petition when there is no prosecution?

Subjects

  • revision
  • criminal procedure
  • want of prosecution
  • juvenile
  • High Court

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                            LUCKNOW
                                                       CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 216 of 2025

                                     Juvenile X Thru. His Father
                                                                                             .....Revisionist(s)
                                                                     Versus

                                     State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.
                                     And Another                                                  .....Opposite
                                                                                                        Party(s)

                                     Counsel for Revisionist(s)    : Seema Srivastava, Ajai Kumar Singh,
                                                                     Chitransh Srivastava, Farooqahmad
                                     Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

                                    Court No. - 27
                                             HON'BLE RAM MANOHAR NARAYAN MISHRA, J.

                                    Case called out.

                                    None appears from the either side when the matter is taken up.

                                    Learned A.G.A. is present for the State respondent. Revision is already
                                    fixed in the list of infructuous cases.

                                    Revision stands dismissed for want of prosecution.

                                    Consigned to record.




                                                                         (Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra,J.)
                                    December 16, 2025
                                    mks




Digitally signed by :-
MANISH SAXENA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,
Lucknow Bench


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.