Allahabad High Court
SUBHASH CHAUBEYversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER
- Decided
- Bench
- HARVIR SINGH
Holding
The revision is dismissed as infructuous because a final judgment has already been passed.
Summary
The petitioners filed a criminal revision (No. 2201 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging a decision of the trial court. Counsel for the petitioners argued that the revision had become infructuous because a final judgment had already been rendered by the trial court. The court examined whether a revision could proceed when the substantive matter had been finally decided. Finding that the purpose of the revision was defeated by the final judgment, the court held that the revision could not be entertained. Consequently, the revision was dismissed as infructuous.
Issues considered
- Whether a criminal revision is maintainable when a final judgment has already been passed by the trial court
Subjects
- revision
- criminal procedure
- final judgment
- infructuous
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 2201 of 2026
Subhash Chaubey
.....Revisionist(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Another
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Vikram Bahadur Yadav
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Haseen Ahmad, Saurabh Basu, Sipte
Husain, G.A.
Court No. - 78
HON'BLE HARVIR SINGH, J.
1. Learned counsel for the revisionist states that the present revision has
become infructuous for the reason that, a final judgment has already been
passed by the learned Trial Court.
2. Accordingly, the instant revision is dismissed as infructuous.
(Harvir Singh,J.)
September 18, 2026
Mini
Digitally signed by :-
MINI KANAUJIYA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…