Allahabad High Court
KRISHNANANDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
- Decided
- Bench
- JAI KRISHNA UPADHYAY
Holding
The criminal revision is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Summary
Krishnanand filed a criminal revision (No. 2349 of 2026) against the State of U.P. and another party. The revisionist's counsel, Arun Kumar Srivastava and others, submitted that the revision had become infructuous. The court considered whether the revision could still be entertained. Relying on the counsel's statement, the court held that the revision was indeed infructuous. Consequently, the criminal revision was dismissed.
Issues considered
- Whether the criminal revision filed by the petitioner is infructuous and should be dismissed
Subjects
- criminal revision
- infructuous
- dismissal
- High Court of Allahabad
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 2349 of 2026
Krishnanand
.....Revisionist(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Another
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Arun Kumar Srivastava, Piyush Kumar
Dwivedi, Priyanka Srivastava
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 85
HON'BLE JAI KRISHNA UPADHYAY, J.
1. Shri Shashank Srivastava, Advocate holding brief for Shri Arun Kumar
Srivastava, learned counsel for the revisionist states that the present criminal
revision has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as such.
2. In view of the statement made, the criminal revision is dismissed as
having become infructuous.
September 18, 2026
safi
(Jai Krishna Upadhyay,J.)
Digitally signed by :-
MAHBOOB SAFI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…