Allahabad High Court
AFTAB ALAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
- Decided
- Bench
- JAI KRISHNA UPADHYAY
Holding
The criminal revision is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Summary
Aftab Alam filed Criminal Revision No. 2355 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging the order of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three other respondents. The revisionist was represented by counsel Mir Sayed, while the opposite party was represented by G.A. During the hearing, counsel for the revisionist submitted that the revision had become infructuous and should be dismissed. The court considered the submission and found no merit in proceeding with the revision. Consequently, the court dismissed the criminal revision as infructuous. The judgment was delivered by Hon'ble Justice Jai Krishna Upadhyay on September 18, 2026.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate disposition when a criminal revision is deemed infructuous?
Subjects
- criminal revision
- infructuous
- dismissal
- high court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 2355 of 2026
Aftab Alam
.....Revisionist(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Mir Sayed
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 85
HON'BLE JAI KRISHNA UPADHYAY, J.
1. Shri Abdul Salim Ahmad, Advocate holding brief for Shri Mir Syed,
learned counsel for the revisionist states that the present criminal revision
has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as such.
2. In view of the statement made, the criminal revision is dismissed as
having become infructuous.
September 18, 2026
safi
(Jai Krishna Upadhyay,J.)
Digitally signed by :-
MAHBOOB SAFI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…