Allahabad High Court
SUKHDEVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
- Decided
- Bench
- LAKSHMI KANT SHUKLA
Holding
The criminal revision is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary
The revisionist, Sukhdev, filed a criminal revision (No. 2634 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. At the hearing, counsel for the revisionist announced that he does not wish to pursue the revision and seeks to withdraw it. The learned Additional Government Advocate and the counsel for the second opposite party, Shailesh Kumar Mishra, expressed no objection to the withdrawal. The court considered the request and, noting the lack of any opposition, allowed the withdrawal. Consequently, the criminal revision was dismissed as withdrawn. The order was pronounced by Hon'ble Justice Lakshmi Kant Shukla on May 6, 2026.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate procedural disposition when a revisionist seeks to withdraw a criminal revision and the opposite parties do not object?
Subjects
- withdrawal of criminal revision
- procedural law
- criminal procedure
- high court
- revision dismissed
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 2634 of 2025
Sukhdev
.....Revisionist(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Anurag Pandey, Praval Tripathi
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Shailesh Kumar Mishra
Court No. - 45
HON'BLE LAKSHMI KANT SHUKLA, J.
1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the revisionist has made a
statement at the Bar that he does not intend to press this criminal revision
and seeks to withdraw it.
2. Learned AGA as well as Sri Shailesh Kumar Mishra, the learned counsel
appearing on behalf of opposite party no. 2 has no objection to the prayer
made by the learned counsel for revisionist.
3. In view of the above statement, this criminal revision is dismissed as
withdrawn.
(Lakshmi Kant Shukla,J.)
May 6, 2026
Arti
Digitally signed by :-
ARTI SHARMA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…