Allahabad High Court
SMT. AYUSHIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
- Decided
- Bench
- JAI KRISHNA UPADHYAY
Holding
The court held that a criminal revision may be withdrawn upon the parties' compromise and dismissed the revision as withdrawn.
Summary
The petitioner, Smt. Ayushi, filed Criminal Revision No. 3228 of 2018 against the State of U.P. and another party. The petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the parties had reached a compromise outside of court and sought to withdraw the revision. The court considered whether a criminal revision could be withdrawn after a settlement. Finding no legal impediment, the court allowed the withdrawal application. Consequently, the criminal revision was dismissed as withdrawn.
Issues considered
- What is the effect of a compromise between parties on the continuance of a criminal revision?
Subjects
- criminal revision
- withdrawal
- compromise
- procedural law
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 3228 of 2018
Smt. Ayushi
.....Revisionist(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Another
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Dhiraj Kumar Pandey
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Harish Chandra Mishra
Court No. - 85
HON'BLE JAI KRISHNA UPADHYAY, J.
Criminal Misc. Withdrawal Application
1. Shri Dheeraj Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the revisionist states that
as the parties have entered into a compromise out of the Court, the
revisionist wants to withdraw the present criminal revision, and the same
may be dismissed as withdrawn and the aforesaid withdrawal application
may be allowed.
2. In view of the statement made, the aforesaid withdrawal application is
allowed and the criminal revision is dismissed as withdrawn.
October 1, 2026
safi
(Jai Krishna Upadhyay,J.)
Digitally signed by :-
MAHBOOB SAFI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…