Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SANTOSH KUMAR GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The revision is dismissed as not pressed.

Summary

The petitioner, Santosh Kumar Gupta, filed a criminal revision (No. 5335 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, his counsel, Lal Chandra Mishra, informed the court that the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the revision. The court, taking note of this statement, dismissed the revision on the ground that it was not pressed. The order was recorded in the presence of the learned Additional Government Advocate for the State. No substantive merits of the revision were examined.

Issues considered

  • Whether the criminal revision should be dismissed on the ground that it is not pressed by the petitioner?

Subjects

  • criminal revision
  • dismissal
  • procedure
  • not pressed

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                                     CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 5335 of 2025

                                    Santosh Kumar Gupta
                                                                                                 .....Revisionist(s)
                                                                       Versus
                                    State Of U.P. And 2 Others
                                                                                                      .....Opposite
                                                                                                            Party(s)

                                    Counsel for Revisionist(s)                   :    Lal Chandra Mishra
                                    Counsel for Opposite Party(s)                :    G.A.

                                    Court No. - 85
                                                       HON'BLE MADAN PAL SINGH, J.

                                    1. Sri Lal Chandra Mishra, learned counsel for the revisionist states that he
                                    does not wish to press the present criminal revision and, therefore, prays that
                                    the same may be dismissed as not pressed.

                                    2. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the revisionist, the
                                    present criminal revision is dismissed as not pressed.

                                    3. This order has passed in the presence learned AGA for the State

                                    March 19, 2026
                                    Akbar
                                                                                           (Madan Pal Singh,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
MOHAMMAD AKBAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.