Allahabad High Court
RAVI KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
- Decided
- Bench
- SANJIV KUMAR
Holding
The criminal revision is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary
Ravi Kumar filed a criminal revision (No. 5578 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging a decision of a lower court. The revisionist was represented by counsel Raghuraj Singh, while the State and other respondents were represented by G.A. and Vishal Kumar. At the hearing, the revisionist's counsel announced that the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the revision and sought to withdraw it, reserving the right to approach another forum if needed. The court accepted the withdrawal and dismissed the revision as withdrawn. The certified copies of the documents were ordered to be returned to the revisionist's counsel.
Subjects
- criminal revision
- withdrawal of proceedings
- High Court
- procedural law
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 5578 of 2026
Ravi Kumar
.....Revisionist(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Raghuraj Singh
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 88
HON'BLE SANJIV KUMAR, J.
Mr. Vishal Kumar, Advocate has filed vakalatnama on behalf of opposite
party no.2 today in Court, which is taken on record.
Mr. Raghuraj Singh, learned counsel for revisionist, learned AGA for the
State, Mr. Vishal Kumar, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 are present.
At the very outset, learned counsel for the revisionist has made a statement
that he does not want to press this revision and seeks to withdraw it with
liberty to seek appropriate remedy at an appropriate forum.
In view of the above statement, the instant criminal revision is dismissed as
withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
Certified copy of the documents be returned to learned counsel for the
revisionist as per Rules.
(Sanjiv Kumar,J.)
September 10, 2026
Subham
Digitally signed by :-
SUBHAM KUSHWAHA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…