Allahabad High Court
RAM PRATAP PATEL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
- Decided
- Bench
- SANJIV KUMAR
Holding
The revision is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary
Ram Pratap Patel and another filed a criminal revision before the Allahabad High Court. At the admission stage, counsel for the revisionists informed the court that they wished to withdraw the revision. The State’s Advocate General raised no objection to the withdrawal. The court, having received the consent of both parties, dismissed the revision as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the case were considered.
Issues considered
- Whether a criminal revision can be withdrawn at the admission stage with the consent of the parties?
Subjects
- Criminal Revision
- Withdrawal of Revision
- High Court Procedure
- Allahabad High Court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 5621 of 2026
Ram Pratap Patel And Another
.....Revisionist(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Another
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Ambrish Chandra Pandey, Pramod
Kumar Tripathi
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 88
HON'BLE SANJIV KUMAR, J.
1. Heard Shri Ambrish Chandra Pandey, learned Counsel for the revisionists
and learned A.G.A on behalf of the State.
2. At the stage of admission of this revision, learned Counsel for the
revisionists submits that he does not want to press this revision and wants to
withdraw it.
3. Learned AGA has no objection to the aforesaid prayer made by learned
counsel for the revisionists.
4. In view of the above, the instant revision is dismissed as withdrawn, at
the admission stage.
September 24, 2026
AdityaG
(Sanjiv Kumar,J.)
Digitally signed by :-
ADITYA GAUTAM
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…