Allahabad High Court
RAMAN KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
- Decided
- Bench
- SANJIV KUMAR
Holding
The revision is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary
Raman Kumar filed a criminal revision (No. 5989 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging a decision of the State of Uttar Pradesh. At the admission stage, counsel for the revisionist, Shweta Nishad, informed the court that the revisionist no longer wished to pursue the matter and sought to withdraw the revision. The State’s counsel, G.A., raised no objection to the withdrawal. The court, noting the parties’ consent, dismissed the revision as withdrawn. Certified copies of the documents were ordered to be returned to the revisionist’s counsel.
Issues considered
- Whether a revision can be withdrawn by the petitioner at the admission stage with the consent of the opposite party.
Subjects
- revision
- withdrawal
- criminal procedure
- High Court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 5989 of 2026
Raman Kumar
.....Revisionist(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And Another
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Shweta Nishad
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 88
HON'BLE SANJIV KUMAR, J.
1. Heard Ms. Shweta Nishad, learned Counsel for the revisionist and learned
A.G.A on behalf of the State.
2. At the stage of admission of this revision, learned Counsel for the
revisionist submits that she does not want to press this revision and wants to
withdraw it.
3. Learned AGA has no objection to the aforesaid prayer made by learned
counsel for the revisionist.
4. In view of the above, the instant revision is dismissed as withdrawn.
5. Certified copies of the documents be returned to learned Counsel for the
revisionist, as per rules.
October 1, 2026
AdityaG
(Sanjiv Kumar,J.)
Digitally signed by :-
ADITYA GAUTAM
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…