Allahabad High Court
CHANDRASENversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
- Decided
- Bench
- LAKSHMI KANT SHUKLA
Holding
The revision is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary
In a criminal revision (No. 6260 of 2024) filed by Chandrasen against the State of U.P. and two others, the petitioner’s counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the revision. The Additional Government Advocate for the State raised no objection to this request. The court considered whether a revision could be withdrawn at the petitioner's request without prejudice. Finding no impediment, the court ordered the revision to be dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, the criminal revision was terminated without any substantive adjudication on the merits.
Issues considered
- Whether a criminal revision can be withdrawn by the petitioner at any stage of the proceedings
Subjects
- criminal revision
- withdrawal of petition
- procedural law
- high court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 6260 of 2024
Chandrasen
.....Revisionist(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Ajay Kumar, Shri Kant
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Dhanraj Singh Yadav, G.A.
Court No. - 87
HON'BLE LAKSHMI KANT SHUKLA, J.
1. After some length of arguments, learned counsel for the revisionist
submitted that he does not wish to press the present criminal revision and
he may be permitted to withdraw the same.
2. Learned A.G.A. for the State has no objection to the aforesaid
innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the revisionist.
3. In view of above, the instant criminal revision is liable to be dismissed
as withdrawn.
4. Accordingly, it is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Lakshmi Kant Shukla,J.)
September 8, 2026
RPD
Digitally signed by :-
RATAN PRAKASH DWIVEDI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…