Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

MAGMA HDI GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD. 13 RANA PRATAP MARG LKO.versusANITA DEVI AND 4 ORS.

Decided
Disposal
Decided by Lok Adalat

Holding

The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

Magma Hdi General Insurance Co Ltd filed a first appeal before the Allahabad High Court against Order No. 335 of 2018. The appellant’s counsel, Indrajeet and Amit Kumar Srivastava, were listed but no representative appeared in court on the scheduled date. No request for adjournment or any other procedural step was made by the appellant. The court observed that the appeal had not been prosecuted and therefore could not be entertained. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution. The interim order that had been in force was vacated.

Issues considered

  • Whether an appeal may be dismissed for want of prosecution when no party appears before the court?

Subjects

  • appeal
  • procedural dismissal
  • want of prosecution
  • interim order vacated

Judgment

                                                 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                                LUCKNOW
                                                     FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 335 of 2018


                                     Magma Hdi General Insurance Co Ltd. 13 Rana
                                     Pratap Marg Lko.                                             .....Appellant(s)
                                                                        Versus

                                     Anita Devi And 4 Ors.
                                                                                                .....Respondent(s)

                                     Counsel for Appellant(s)           :     Indrajeet, Amit Kumar Srivastava
                                     Counsel for Respondent(s)          :

                                    Court No. - 20
                                                        HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J.

                                    1. Case called out in the revised call.

                                    2. No one appeared on behalf of the appellant(s) to press this appeal nor
                                    there is any request to adjourn or pass over the case.

                                    3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

                                    4. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.



                                                                                            (Prashant Kumar,J.)
                                    January 5, 2026
                                    Anupam S/-




Digitally signed by :-
ANUPAM SINGH PATEL
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,
Lucknow Bench


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.