Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

POONAM KHATRI DARANIversusKAMAL DARANI

Decided

Holding

The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The appellant filed a first appeal against a Family Court judgment dated 7 September 2021 that ordered maintenance pendente lite. The appellant later filed a withdrawal application on 27 January 2026, citing that the parties had settled their differences as reflected in a joint supplementary affidavit dated 19 December 2024. The respondent’s counsel also confirmed that a settlement had been reached. The High Court considered the withdrawal application and the parties’ statements. Finding that the appeal had been voluntarily withdrawn, the Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn. The judgment was pronounced on 18 March 2026.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate disposition of an appeal when the appellant has filed a withdrawal application after a settlement between the parties?

Subjects

  • maintenance
  • family law
  • appeal withdrawal
  • settlement
  • pendente lite

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                         FIRST APPEAL No. - 193 of 2022

                                    Poonam Khatri Darani
                                                                                              .....Appellant(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    Kamal Darani
                                                                                            .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Appellant(s)       : Arvind Srivastava, Mohd. Naushad
                                                                     Siddiqui
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)      : Rashmi Misra

                                    Court No. - 29
                                                     HON'BLE ARINDAM SINHA, J.
                                                     HON'BLE SATYA VEER SINGH, J.

                                    1. Parties are represented in this appeal preferred against judgment dated
                                    7th September, 2021 of the Family Court directing maintenance pendente
                                    lite. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Srivastava instructed by Mohd. Naushad Siddiqui,
                                    learned advocates appear on behalf of appellant. Mr. Srivastava submits,
                                    withdrawal application dated 27th January, 2026 has been filed by his
                                    client, consequent to differences settled as recorded in joint
                                    supplementary affidavit dated 19th December, 2024 filed in Criminal
                                    Misc. Application no.33065 of 2024.

                                    2. Ms. Rashmi Misra, learned advocate appears on behalf of respondent
                                    and submits, there has been settlement.

                                    3. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.



                                                                                          (Arindam Sinha,J.)



                                                                                        (Satya Veer Singh,J.)
                                    March 18, 2026
                                    VS




Digitally signed by :-
VIDYA SAGAR BARATAM
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.