Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

RESHMA PALversusUMESH PAL

Decided

Holding

The appellant must seek maintenance under Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 by filing a separate application, and no order is required in the present appeal.

Summary

The appellant, a divorced wife, challenged an ex-parte decree of divorce that did not address her claim for maintenance. She sought to appeal the judgment solely to obtain maintenance, while the respondent argued that the Family Court's decision was correct on facts and law. The court noted that under Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 a divorced spouse may apply for maintenance at any time after the decree. Consequently, the court held that the appellant should pursue a separate maintenance application rather than the present appeal. No further order was made and the appeal was disposed of.

Issues considered

  • Whether the appellant can obtain maintenance through the present appeal against the ex-parte divorce decree

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • maintenance
  • divorce
  • Hindu Marriage Act
  • ex-parte judgment
  • appeal

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                         FIRST APPEAL No. - 786 of 2021

                                    Reshma Pal
                                                                                                .....Appellant(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    Umesh Pal
                                                                                              .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Appellant(s)                   :   Manish Kumar Pandey
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                  :   Atul Kumar Srivastava

                                    Court No. - 29
                                                      HON'BLE ARINDAM SINHA, J.
                                                      HON'BLE SATYA VEER SINGH, J.

                                    1. Mr. Manish Kumar Pandey, learned advocate appears on behalf of
                                    appellant, who was wife in the marriage dissolved on judgment dated 8th
                                    August, 2018. He submits, his instructions are, his client does not want to
                                    prosecute the appeal except that she has claim for maintenance. On query
                                    he submits, the judgment was made ex-parte against his client. The
                                    Family Court did not even consider exercising discretion to direct
                                    maintenance.

                                    2. Mr. Atul Kumar Srivastava, learned advocate appears on behalf of
                                    respondent. He submits, the Family Court in passing impugned judgment
                                    made no error, either on facts or in law.

                                    3. Section 25 in Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 enables a divorced spouse to
                                    apply for maintenance at any time subsequent to passing of the decree. As
                                    such, appellant must find her remedy by applying for maintenance.

                                    4. In view of aforesaid, no order need be made in the appeal apart from
                                    our above observation. It is disposed of.



                                                                                            (Arindam Sinha,J.)



                                                                                          (Satya Veer Singh,J.)
                                    March 18, 2026
                                    VS




Digitally signed by :-
VIDYA SAGAR BARATAM
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.