Allahabad High Court
HAR PRASAD AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
- Decided
- Bench
- SAURABH SRIVASTAVA
Holding
The application was not heard and the matter was listed for a later date due to the applicants' non‑appearance.
Summary
An application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was filed by Har Prasad and seven others against the State of U.P. and another party. The counsel for the applicants, Ganesh Shanker Srivastava and Vinod Kumar Maurya, did not appear before the court even after a revised call. Consequently, the court ordered that the matter be listed for hearing after a period of two months. No further arguments or evidence were presented. The judgment records only the procedural step of listing the case due to the applicants' non‑appearance.
Issues considered
- Whether an application under Section 528 can proceed when the applicants' counsel fail to appear
Legislation cited
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 528
Subjects
- Section 528
- application
- non‑appearance
- listing
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 11322 of 2026
Har Prasad And 7 Others
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Another
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ganesh Shanker Srivastava, Vinod
Kumar Maurya
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Manish Kumar Kashyap,
Virendra Pal Singh
Court No. - 77
HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J.
Even in revised call, none appeared on behalf of applicants.
List after two months.
(Saurabh Srivastava,J.)
May 6, 2026
Shaswat
Digitally signed by :-
SHASWAT SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…