Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

MOMIN @ CHHOTUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Decided

Holding

The application under Section 528 BNSS is dismissed as infructuous.

Summary

Momin @ Chhotu filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant’s counsel argued that the application had become infructuous and should be dismissed. The counsel for the second opposite party raised no objection to this submission. The court, after hearing the parties, accepted that the application was indeed infructuous. Consequently, the court dismissed the application under Section 528 BNSS as infructuous.

Issues considered

  • Whether the application filed under Section 528 BNSS should be entertained or dismissed as infructuous

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • Section 528
  • application dismissed
  • infructuous
  • High Court
  • procedural law

Judgment

                                                   HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                      APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 14857 of 2026

                                    Momin @ Chhotu
                                                                                                .....Applicant(s)
                                                                         Versus

                                    State of U.P. and Another
                                                                                                     .....Opposite
                                                                                                           Party(s)

                                    Counsel for Applicant(s)      : Devendra Mani Tripathi, Rahul Tiwari
                                    Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Ahamad Farhan, G.A., Haya Rizvi

                                    Court No. - 80
                                                       HON'BLE NAND PRABHA SHUKLA, J.

                                    1. Heard Mr. Devendra Mani Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicant,
                                    Mr. Mohd. Bilal, holding brief of Ms. Haya Rizvi, learned counsel for the
                                    opposite party No. 2, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

                                    2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicant submits that this
                                    application has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as
                                    infructuous.

                                    3. Learned counsel for the opposite party No. 2 has no objection in this
                                    regard.

                                    4. Accordingly, the application u/s 528 BNSS is dismissed as infructuous.


                                                                                      (Nand Prabha Shukla,J.)
                                    September 8, 2026
                                    Shivani Sri.




Digitally signed by :-
SHIVANI SRIVASTAVA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.