Allahabad High Court
RAJEEV KUMAR @ RAJUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
- Decided
- Bench
- SAURABH SRIVASTAVA
Holding
The court adjourned the application for two months due to the applicant’s counsel’s failure to appear.
Summary
The applicant, Rajeev Kumar @ Raju, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court. The learned Additional Government Advocate was present, but no counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant even after a revised call. The court noted the non‑appearance and did not proceed to hear the application. Consequently, the matter was adjourned and ordered to be listed after a period of two months. No substantive merits of the application were addressed.
Legislation cited
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 528
Subjects
- Section 528
- Criminal Procedure
- Adjournment
- Non-appearance
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 14978 of 2026
Rajeev Kumar @ Raju
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Another
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mohd Adil
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 77
HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J.
1. Although, learned AGA is present, no one appeared on behalf of applicant
even in the revised call to press this application.
2. List this matter after two months.
May 6, 2026
Vivek Kr.
(Saurabh Srivastava,J.)
Digitally signed by :-
VIVEK KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…