Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SANJEEV BANSAL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Decided

Holding

The application is dismissed as it has become infructuous due to the parties' settlement.

Summary

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. During the pendency of the proceedings, the parties reached an amicable settlement, and a copy of the settlement agreement was placed on record. Both counsel acknowledged the settlement. The court held that, in view of the settlement, there was nothing further to adjudicate and the application became infructuous. Consequently, the court dismissed the application as infructuous.

Issues considered

  • Whether an application under Section 528 of the CrPC should continue when the parties have settled the dispute.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • settlement
  • Section 528
  • Criminal Procedure
  • infructuous
  • dismissal

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                               APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 17423 of 2025

                                    Sanjeev Bansal And Another
                                                                                                  .....Applicant(s)
                                                                       Versus
                                    State of U.P. and Another
                                                                                                     .....Opposite
                                                                                                           Party(s)

                                    Counsel for Applicant(s)      : Anurag Sharma
                                    Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Dilip Kumar Goswami, G.A., Narendra
                                                                    Singh

                                    Court No. - 81
                                                       HON'BLE MADAN PAL SINGH, J.

                                    1. Sri Dilip Kumar Goswami, learned counsel appearing for opposite party
                                    no. 2, states that during the pendency of the present proceedings, the parties
                                    have amicably settled their dispute. A copy of the settlement agreement
                                    entered into between the parties has been placed on record. The aforesaid
                                    fact has not been denied by Sri Anurag Sharma, learned counsel for the
                                    applicant..

                                    2. In view of the aforesaid settlement arrived at between the parties, nothing
                                    further remains to be adjudicated in the present application. Accordingly, the
                                    present application has been rendered infructuous.

                                    3. Accordingly, the present application is dismissed as having become
                                    infructuous.

                                    September 9, 2026
                                    Akbar
                                                                                          (Madan Pal Singh,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
MOHAMMAD AKBAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.