Allahabad High Court
DEVENDER PALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
- Decided
- Bench
- PADAM NARAIN MISHRA
Summary
The applicant, Devender Pal, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act (BNSS No. 18286 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant’s counsel, Ravi Kant Verma, submitted a supplementary affidavit, while the opposite party’s counsel, G.A. and Shri Kant Shukla, filed a counter‑affidavit. The matter was heard by Justice Padam Narain Mishra, with Advocate Arpit Mandhyan appearing on behalf of the applicant and the State’s AGA also present. The court recorded the affidavits and referred the parties to the order passed in a connected application (BNSS No. 13143 of 2025, Amavas Pal & Others v. State U.P. & Another). No substantive reasoning or final order was articulated in this judgment; the parties were directed to see the order in the connected case for the disposition.
Subjects
- Section 528
- BNSS
- application
- supplementary affidavit
- counter affidavit
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 18286 of 2025
Devender Pal
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Another
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ravi Kant Verma
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Shri Kant Shukla
Court No. - 82
HON'BLE PADAM NARAIN MISHRA, J.
1. Learned counsel for the applicant has filed supplementary affidavit and
learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 has filed counter affidavit,
which are taken on record.
2. Heard Sri Arpit Mandhyan, Advocate, holding brief of Sri ravi Kant
Verma, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Shri Kant Shukla, learned
counsel for opposite party no. 2, learned AGA for the State and perused
the record.
3. For orders(s), see order of the date passed in connected Application
U/S 528 BNSS No. - 13143 of 2025 (Amavas Pal And 8 Others v/s State
U.P. and Another).
(Padam Narain Mishra,J.)
February 24, 2026
v.k. updh.
Digitally signed by :-
VINOD KUMAR UPADHYAY
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…