Allahabad High Court
ROHIT KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
- Decided
- Bench
- SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI
Holding
The application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
Rohit Kumar filed an application before the Allahabad High Court under Section 528 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The applicant’s counsel, Ankit Srivastava and Ch. Dil Nisar, failed to appear despite a revised call. Only the learned brief holder for the State, Shri Puspraj Singh, was present. The Court noted the absence of any representation for the applicant and held that the proceeding could not continue. Consequently, the application was dismissed for want of prosecution.
Issues considered
- Whether the application filed under Section 528 of the Negotiable Instruments Act should be dismissed for want of prosecution?
Legislation cited
- Negotiable Instruments Act — s. 528
Subjects
- Section 528
- Negotiable Instruments Act
- dismissal for want of prosecution
- application
- High Court
- criminal procedure
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 29790 of 2026
Rohit Kumar
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Another
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ankit Srivastava, Ch. Dil Nisar
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 77
HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J.
Even after revised call, none has appeared on behalf of the applicant,
however, Shri Puspraj Singh, learned Brief Holder for the State is present.
Accordingly, present application stands dismissed for want of
prosecution.
(Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.)
September 9, 2026
KJ
Digitally signed by :-
KAMARJAHAN ANSARI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…