AJAY PANDEY AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

         HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

           APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 33126 of 2026

Ajay Pandey And 3 Others
                                                             .....Applicant(s)
                                   Versus
State of U.P. and Another
                                                                .....Opposite
                                                                      Party(s)

Counsel for Applicant(s)      : Nimesh Kumar Shukla, Saurabh Sahu,
                                Vinod Kumar Tirpathi
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

Court No. - 79
                 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned AGA for the State.

2. The present application has been preferred for seeking quashing of
charge-sheet dated 26.06.2025 along with cognizance/summoning order
dated 01.10.2025 as well as entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.595 of
2025 (State vs. Ajay Pandey and Others) arising out of Case Crime No.187
of 2025, under Sections 324(4), 352, 351(2) BNS, P.S. Chandwak, District-
Jaunpur, pending in the court of learned ACJ (JD), New Court
No.10/Judicial Magistrate, Jaunpur.

3. Learned counsel for applicants has made only one submission before the
Court that offences under Sections 324(4), 352, 351(2) BNS are non-
cognizable and in view of the explanation to Section 2(1)h BNSS, the
charge sheet filed by the Investigating Officer concerned cannot proceed as a
police case and the same is liable to be proceeded with as a complaint case.
In support of his submission, learned counsel of applicants has placed
reliance upon the judgments passed in the case of Shakila Bano and others
Vs. State of U.P. and another, 2008 (61) ACC 636.

4. Although, learned AGA opposed the prayer sought through the instant
application but did not dispute the submissions so made by learned counsel
for applicants.

5. Before proceeding further, the relevant provisions of Section 2(1)h BNSS
are being reproduced for ready reference as under:-
                                                                                              NA528 No. 33126 of 2026
                                                                     2


                                    "2. Definitions.- (1) In this Sanhita, unless the context otherwise requires,-

                                    (h) "complaint" means any allegation made orally or in writing to a
                                    Magistrate, with a view to his taking action under this Sanhita, that some
                                    person, whether known or unknown, has committed an offence, but does not
                                    include a police report.

                                    Explanation.- A report made by a police officer in a case which discloses,
                                    after investigation, the commission of a non- cognizable offence shall be
                                    deemed to be a complaint; and the police officer by whom such report is
                                    made shall be deemed to be the complainant."

                                    6. In view of the above explanation, charge sheet submitted by the concerned
                                    Investigating Officer in the present case under Sections 324(4), 352, 351(2)
                                     BNS shall be treated as complaint and it is to be decided as complaint and
                                    the learned Magistrate fell in legal error by taking cognizance as State case
                                    and the orders passed by him is, therefore, liable to be set aside.

                                    7. Since the legal issue has been raised by learned counsel for the applicants
                                    and as such process to issue notice to opposite party no.2 is hereby dispensed
                                    with.

                                    8. In view thereof, cognizance/summoning order dated 01.10.2025 passed by
                                    learned ACJ (JD), New Court No.10/Judicial Magistrate, Jaunpur against the
                                    applicants on the basis of charge-sheet submitted by concerned Investigating
                                    Officer under Sections 324(4), 352, 351(2) BNS treating the same as State
                                    case, is set aside.

                                    9. Accordingly, the instant application is partly allowed.

                                    10. However, it is made clear that this order shall not preclude the learned
                                    court concerned to proceed with the case treating it as complaint case, if
                                    required, in accordance with law.

                                    September 8, 2026
                                    Saif
                                                                                          (Saurabh Srivastava,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
SHAIKH SAIF ABDIN
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad