Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

ASHUTOSH KUMAR PATHAK ALIAS ASHUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Decided

Holding

The court held that an application under Section 528 cannot be entertained if the applicant does not press it, leading to its dismissal.

Summary

The applicant, Ashutosh Kumar Pathak, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Special Case No. 433 of 2025, which involved charges under Sections 50, 354(gha) IPC, Sections 11/12 of the POCSO Act, and Section 67(b) of the Income Tax Act. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel expressed a desire not to pursue the present application and instead sought liberty to file a more appropriate petition before a competent court. The court noted the applicant's request and considered whether the application could be entertained without the applicant's active pursuit. Since the applicant chose not to press the application, the court decided there was no basis to proceed. Consequently, the application was dismissed as not pressed, with liberty granted to file a suitable application later.

Issues considered

  • Can an application under Section 528 of the BNSS be entertained when the applicant does not wish to press it?
  • Should the court grant liberty to the applicant to file a different appropriate application before a competent jurisdiction?

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • Section 528
  • BNSS
  • quash proceedings
  • procedural dismissal
  • criminal charges
  • POCSO Act
  • application not pressed

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                               APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 33727 of 2025

                                    Ashutosh Kumar Pathak Alias Ashu
                                                                                                  .....Applicant(s)
                                                                       Versus
                                    State of U.P. and Another
                                                                                                     .....Opposite
                                                                                                           Party(s)

                                    Counsel for Applicant(s)                    :   Diwan Saifullah Khan
                                    Counsel for Opposite Party(s)               :   G.A.

                                    Court No. - 76
                                                    HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J.

                                    Sri Diwan Saifullah Khan, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri
                                    Karunakar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State are present.

                                    The present application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik
                                    Suraksha Sanhita has been filed to quash the entire proceedings of Special
                                    Case No. 433 of 2025, arising out of Case Crime No. 08 of 2023, under
                                    Sections 50, 354(gha) of I.P.C., Section 11/12 POCSO Act, and Section
                                    67(b) of I.T. Act, Police Station- Cyber Crime, District- Varanasi, as well as
                                    cognizance/ summoning order dated 21.05.2025 pending in the Court of
                                    Special Judge POCSO Act, Varanasi.

                                    After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicant does not want to
                                    press this application and wants liberty to file an appropriate application/
                                    proceedings before the court of competent jurisdiction.

                                    Certified copy of the order may be returned to the learned counsel for the
                                    applicant after retaining a xerox thereof.

                                    In view of the above, the application is dismissed as not pressed with the
                                    aforesaid liberty.

                                    April 2, 2026
                                    Ishan
                                                                                    (Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
ISHAN JAISWAL
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.