Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

MENPAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Decided

Holding

The application is dismissed as not pressed, with liberty granted to the applicant to file an appropriate application before a competent jurisdiction.

Summary

The applicant, Menpal Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the entire criminal proceedings (Session Trial No. 278 of 2026) arising from multiple charges under various sections of the Indian Penal Code. The application was presented before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, with counsel Himanshi Nausran and Ulajhan Singh Bind representing the applicant and G.A. representing the State. During the hearing, the applicant’s counsel indicated that he did not wish to pursue the present application and instead desired liberty to file a more appropriate application before a competent court. The Court noted that the application was not pressed and therefore dismissed it, granting the applicant liberty to file a suitable application in the appropriate jurisdiction. The certified copy of the documents was to be returned to the applicant’s counsel after a xerox was retained by the Court.

Issues considered

  • Whether the application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the criminal proceedings, is maintainable in the present form.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • quash of criminal proceedings
  • Section 528
  • Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita
  • application dismissed
  • procedural liberty

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                               APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 34698 of 2026

                                    Menpal Singh
                                                                                                  .....Applicant(s)
                                                                       Versus
                                    State of U.P. and Another
                                                                                                     .....Opposite
                                                                                                           Party(s)

                                    Counsel for Applicant(s)         : Himanshi Nausran, Ulajhan Singh Bind
                                    Counsel for Opposite Party(s)    : G.A.

                                    Court No. - 77
                                                   HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J.

                                    Heard Ms. Himanshi Nausran, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri
                                    Karunakar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on
                                    record.

                                    The present application under Section 528 of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha
                                    Sanhita, 2023 has been filed by the applicants to quash the entire
                                    proceedings of Session Trial No. 278 of 2026, arising out of case crime No.
                                    122 of 2025, under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 109(1), 117(2), 324(4),
                                    351(3), 61(2), B.N.S., Police Station- Ganga Nagar, District Meerut as well
                                    as order dated 3.6.2026, whereby charge has been framed, pending in the
                                    court of Special Judge (E.C. Act)/Additional Sessions Judge, Meerut.

                                    After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicants does not want to
                                    press this application and wants liberty to file appropriate
                                    application/proceedings before the court of competent jurisdiction.

                                    The instant application is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file
                                    appropriate application/proceedings before the court of competent
                                    jurisdiction.

                                    Office shall return the certified copy of the documents to the learned counsel
                                    for the applicants, after retaining a xerox of the same.

                                    September 24, 2026
                                    T. Sinha
                                                                                    (Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
TRIPTI SINHA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.