Allahabad High Court
VED RAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
- Decided
- Bench
- SAURABH SRIVASTAVA
Holding
The court permitted the withdrawal of the Section 528 application and dismissed it as withdrawn.
Summary
The applicant, Ved Ram, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant sought permission to withdraw the application, and the respondent's counsel raised no objection. The court considered whether a withdrawal of an application under Section 528 could be permitted with the consent of the opposite party. Finding no impediment, the court allowed the withdrawal. Consequently, the application was dismissed as withdrawn.
Issues considered
- Whether an application filed under Section 528 CrPC may be withdrawn with the consent of the opposite party
Legislation cited
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 528
Subjects
- Criminal Procedure
- Section 528
- withdrawal of application
- Bail
- High Court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 36249 of 2026
Ved Ram
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rajendra Prasad Shukla, Sudeep Kumar
Pathak
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 79
HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for parties.
2. At the very outset, Sri Sudeep Kumar Pathak, learned counsel for the
applicant states that he may be permitted to withdraw the present application
to which learned counsel for the respondents has no objection.
3. Accordingly, the instant application stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(Saurabh Srivastava,J.)
September 29, 2026
Shaswat
Digitally signed by :-
SHASWAT SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…