Allahabad High Court
ANIL KUMAR MAURYAversusSTATE OF U.P.
- Decided
- Bench
- VIVEK KUMAR SINGH
Holding
The application is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Summary
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Counsel for the applicant informed the court that the application had become infructuous. The court, relying on this statement, dismissed the application as infructuous. No further arguments or evidence were presented. The dismissal was recorded on 7 May 2026 by Justice Vivek Kumar Singh.
Issues considered
- Whether the application under Section 528 is infructuous and can be dismissed
Legislation cited
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 528
Subjects
- Section 528
- infructuous application
- application dismissal
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 5471 of 2026
Anil Kumar Maurya
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P.
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sanjay, Vinod Kumar Maurya
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 80
HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J.
1. At the very outset, Sri Sanjay Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant,
states that the present application has become infructuous and the same may
be dismissed as such.
2. In view of the above statement made by learned counsel for the applicant,
the present application is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(Vivek Kumar Singh,J.)
May 7, 2026
Radhika
Digitally signed by :-
RADHIKA VISHWAKARMA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…