Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

VINOD KUMAR YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The application is dismissed as not pressed because the applicant withdrew the request.

Summary

The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a direction to the Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 1, Jaunpur, to decide Session Trial No. 283 of 2021 within the stipulated period. The trial pertained to offences under Sections 147, 149, 323, 325, 308, 427, 452, 504, 506 of the IPC arising from a crime reported at Badlapur Police Station, Jaunpur. After hearing arguments, the applicant’s counsel indicated that the application would not be pressed further. The court therefore dismissed the application as not pressed. The certified copy of the documents was ordered to be returned to the applicant’s counsel after retaining a xerox.

Issues considered

  • Whether an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, can be dismissed on the ground that it is not pressed by the applicant.
  • Whether the court should issue a direction to the Additional Sessions Judge to decide the pending criminal trial within a stipulated period.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • Section 529
  • Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita
  • application dismissed
  • not pressed
  • criminal trial
  • procedural direction

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                                APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 4913 of 2026

                                    Vinod Kumar Yadav
                                                                                                  .....Applicant(s)
                                                                       Versus
                                    State Of U.P. And 6 Others
                                                                                                       .....Opposite
                                                                                                             Party(s)

                                    Counsel for Applicant(s)              :   Nameera Naseem, Ram Kesh
                                    Counsel for Opposite Party(s)         :   G.A.

                                    Court No. - 77
                                                  HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J.

                                    Shri Ram Kesh, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Karunakar Singh,
                                    learned A.G.A. for the State are present.

                                    The present application under Section 529 of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha
                                    Sanhita, 2023 has been filed by the applicant with a prayer to issue a
                                    direction to the Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 1, Jaunpur to decide
                                    Session Trial No. 283 of 2021, arising out of case crime No. 89 of 2020,
                                    under Sections 147, 149, 323, 325, 308, 427, 452, 504, 506, I.P.C., Police
                                    Station Badlapur, District Jaunpur within stipulated period.

                                    After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicant does not want to
                                    press this application and the same may be dismissed as not pressed.

                                    The instant application is dismissed as not pressed accordingly.

                                    Office shall return the certified copy of the documents to the learned counsel
                                    for the applicant, after retaining a xerox of the same.

                                    September 17, 2026
                                    T. Sinha
                                                                                    (Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
TRIPTI SINHA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.