Allahabad High Court
RAJESH CHAUDHARYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
- Decided
- Bench
- SAMIT GOPAL
Holding
The court held that anticipatory bail could not be granted to the applicant.
Summary
Rajesh Chaudhary applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, seeking protection from arrest in a pending criminal proceeding. The High Court examined the application and found that the applicant had not satisfied the criteria for anticipatory bail. Consequently, the court rejected the anticipatory bail application. The order also referred to a prior order in Shubham Srivastava v. State of U.P. for guidance. The application was dismissed, leaving the applicant subject to the regular criminal process.
Issues considered
- Whether the applicant is entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code
Legislation cited
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- Section 482
- Criminal Procedure Code
- High Court
- bail application
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482
BNSS No. - 10821 of 2025
Rajesh Chaudhary
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Another
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dharmendra Kumar Shukla, Uma
Nath Pandey
Counsel for Opposite Party(s): G.A.
Court No. - 53
HON'BLE SAMIT GOPAL, J.
1. The anticipatory bail application is rejected.
2. For order, see order of date passed in Criminal Misc. Anticipatory
Bail Application U/S 482 BNSS No. 10806 of 2025 (Shubham
Srivastava Vs. State of U.P.).
February 25, 2026
AS Rathore
(Samit Gopal,J.)
Digitally signed by :-
ABHISHEK SINGH RATHOR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…