Allahabad High Court
JITENDRA YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.
- Decided
- Bench
- JAI PRAKASH TIWARI
Holding
The anticipatory bail application is dismissed as infructuous.
Summary
Jitendra Yadav filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (BNSS No. 1199 of 2026) against the State of U.P. The applicant's counsel, Arunesh Datta, informed the court that the application had become infructuous and requested its dismissal. The court considered the claim of infructuity and found no need to proceed further. Consequently, the court dismissed the anticipatory bail application as infructuous. No substantive merits of the bail request were examined.
Issues considered
- Whether an anticipatory bail application can be dismissed on the ground that it has become infructuous
Legislation cited
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- section 482
- infructuous application
- criminal procedure
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No.
- 1199 of 2026
Jitendra Yadav
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P.
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Arunesh Datta
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 70
HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J.
At the outset, Sri Arunesh Datta, learned counsel for the applicant states
that present application has become infructuous and the same may be
dismissed.
In view of the above statement, the present application is dismissed as
infructuous.
(Jai Prakash Tiwari,J.)
May 18, 2026
Brijesh
Digitally signed by :-
BRIJESH KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…