Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

ROHIT SENGARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Decided

Holding

Anticipatory bail is not maintainable for a bailable offence, and the application was dismissed.

Summary

Rohit Sengar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code for an alleged offence under Section 238 of the BNS, 2023. The court noted that the offence is bailable, and therefore anticipatory bail is not maintainable. The application was dismissed on the ground of non‑maintainability. The court directed the applicant to seek regular bail from the trial court if needed. No substantive discussion of evidence or merits was undertaken.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail is maintainable for an offence that is bailable under the law

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • bailable offence
  • maintainability
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • Section 238

Judgment

                                                HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                        CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No.
                                                                - 2354 of 2026

                                    Rohit Sengar
                                                                                                 .....Applicant(s)
                                                                        Versus

                                    State of U.P. and Another
                                                                                                     .....Opposite
                                                                                                           Party(s)

                                    Counsel for Applicant(s)            :    Anshul Sengar, Atul Kumar Shahi
                                    Counsel for Opposite Party(s)       :    G.A.

                                    Court No. - 72
                                                     HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J.

                                    1. Shri Mukesh Kumar Pandey, learned Advocate, has filed Vakalatnama on
                                    behalf of opposite party no. 2 today in Court, which is taken on record.

                                    2. Supplementary affidavit filed by learned counsel for the applicant is taken
                                    on record.

                                    3. Heard Shri U.K. Saxena, learned Senior Advocate, assisted by Shri
                                    Anshul Sengar, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Mukesh Kumar
                                    Pandey, learned counsel for the first informant and Shri Shiv Dutt Shukla,
                                    learned AGA for the State.

                                    4. The applicant seeks anticipatory bail for the offence under Section 238 of
                                    BNS, 2023. The said offence is bailable. In view of this, the application for
                                    anticipatory bail is not maintainable.

                                    5. Accordingly, the instant application is dismissed as not maintainable. The
                                    applicant shall be at liberty to move before the learned trial court concerned
                                    for regular bail.



                                                                                     (Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.)
                                    March 19, 2026
                                    Rama Kant




Digitally signed by :-
RAMA KANT
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.