Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

ARSHAD ALIAS ADWANIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Decided

Holding

The anticipatory bail application was dismissed as infructuous.

Summary

Arshad Alias Adwani filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant was represented by counsel Rizwan Ullah Siddiqui, while the State was represented by G.A. The counsel for the applicant submitted that the anticipatory bail application had become infructuous. The Court examined the submission and held that the application could no longer be entertained. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as infructuous. The Court ordered that certified copies of the relevant documents be provided to the applicant upon production of photocopies.

Issues considered

  • Whether the anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC is maintainable when it is alleged to be infructuous

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Section 482
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • High Court
  • application dismissed

Judgment

                                               HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                        CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No.
                                                                - 3485 of 2026

                                    Arshad Alias Adwani
                                                                                                 .....Applicant(s)
                                                                       Versus

                                    State of U.P. and Another
                                                                                                    .....Opposite
                                                                                                          Party(s)

                                    Counsel for Applicant(s)                    :   Rizwan Ullah Siddiqui
                                    Counsel for Opposite Party(s)               :   G.A.

                                    Court No. - 71
                                                        HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J.

                                    1. Sri Rizwan Ullah Siddiqui, learned counsel for the applicant and
                                    learned A.G.A. for the State are present.

                                    2. Sri Siddiqui, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the
                                    anticipatory bail application has become infructuous.

                                    3. The anticipatory bail application is dismissed as infructuous.

                                    4. The certified copies of the relevant documents be provided to the
                                    applicant on production of photostat copies of it.



                                                                                             (Avnish Saxena,J.)
                                    May 6, 2026
                                    Krishna*




Digitally signed by :-
KRISHNA KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.