Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

DEVESH @ MONUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Decided

Holding

The Court dismissed the anticipatory bail application as withdrawn, allowing the applicant to re‑file if he wishes.

Summary

The applicant, Devesh @ Monu, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in BNSS No. 4280 of 2026 against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The victim's statement was recorded under Section 183, after which the applicant's counsel sought to withdraw the bail application and re‑file it. The High Court considered the request to withdraw the pending application. The Court dismissed the anticipatory bail application as withdrawn, granting the applicant liberty to move afresh if desired. Certified copies of the order were to be provided upon production of photocopies.

Issues considered

  • Whether an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 can be withdrawn by the applicant after a victim's statement under Section 183 has been recorded
  • Procedural consequences of withdrawing a pending anticipatory bail application

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal of application
  • Section 482 CrPC
  • Section 183 CrPC
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                                               HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                        CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No.
                                                                - 4280 of 2026

                                    Devesh @ Monu
                                                                                              .....Applicant(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    State of U.P. and Another
                                                                                                  .....Opposite
                                                                                                        Party(s)

                                    Counsel for Applicant(s)      : Ajit Kumar Mishra, Atul Kumar Shahi
                                    Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

                                    Court No. - 71
                                                        HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J.

                                    1. Sri Arun Kumar Sharma, learned counsel for the informant hands up
                                    the vakalatnama. The same is taken on record. The name of learned
                                    counsel be shown in the cause list.

                                    2. Heard Sri Atul Kumar Shahi, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri
                                    Sharma, learned counsel for the informant and learned learned A.G.A. for
                                    the State.

                                    3. In pursuance to the statement of victim recorded under Section 183
                                    BNSS, learned counsel for the applicant seeks to withdraw the application
                                    to move afresh.

                                    4. The application is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

                                    5. The certified copies of the orders be provided to the applicant on
                                    production of photostat copies of it.



                                                                                           (Avnish Saxena,J.)
                                    May 5, 2026
                                    Shivangi




Digitally signed by :-
SHIVANGI YADAV
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.