Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

ANIRUDDACHARYA CHELA BHAGWAN DASversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Decided

Holding

The anticipatory bail application was dismissed as it had become infructuous due to the prior grant of bail.

Summary

The applicant, Aniruddacharya Chela Bhagwan Das, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant informed the court that the applicant had already been granted bail by the Sessions Court. The court examined the record and noted that the purpose of the anticipatory bail application was rendered moot by the prior grant of bail. Consequently, the court held that the application had become infructuous. The application was therefore dismissed.

Issues considered

  • Whether an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC should be entertained when the applicant has already been released on bail by a lower court

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Section 482
  • bail
  • infructuous
  • Criminal Procedure Code

Judgment

                                               HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                        CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No.
                                                                - 4933 of 2025

                                    Aniruddacharya Chela Bhagwan Das
                                                                                                 .....Applicant(s)
                                                                       Versus

                                    State of U.P. and Another
                                                                                                    .....Opposite
                                                                                                          Party(s)

                                    Counsel for Applicant(s)              :     Prashant Vyas, Sr. Advocate
                                    Counsel for Opposite Party(s)         :     G.A.

                                    Court No. - 72
                                                     HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J.

                                    1. Heard Ms. Renu Singh, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Prashant Vyas,
                                    learned counsel for the applicant, Mr. Ashish Kumar Tripathi, learned
                                    A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

                                    2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the
                                    application has become infructuous as the applicant has already been
                                    enlarged on bail by learned Sessions Court.

                                    3. Accordingly, the application is dismissed as having become
                                    infructuous.



                                                                                      (Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.)
                                    March 18, 2026
                                    Virendra




Digitally signed by :-
VIRENDRA KUMAR BHARTEEY
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.