Allahabad High Court
RAMASHRAY YADAV @ RAMASHRAY SINGH YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
- Decided
- Bench
- VIVEK KUMAR SINGH
Holding
The anticipatory bail application is disposed of, with a direction to consider any regular bail application filed within three weeks and a stay on coercive action during that period.
Summary
The applicant, Ramashray Yadav, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in connection with a criminal case involving multiple IPC offences. During the hearing, the applicant sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and instead file a regular bail application before the trial court. The State's counsel did not oppose this request. The High Court directed that if the applicant files a regular bail application within three weeks, it will be considered and disposed of expeditiously, and no coercive action will be taken against him during that period. The anticipatory bail application was therefore disposed of with a clear order that no further time will be granted beyond the stipulated three weeks.
Issues considered
- Whether the anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC should be entertained or withdrawn in favor of a regular bail application
- Whether the court can direct a time-bound consideration of a regular bail application and stay coercive action pending such application
Legislation cited
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482
- Indian Penal Code — s. 109(1), 110, 115(2), 117(2), 191(2), 324(4), 351(3), 352
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- regular bail
- Section 482 CrPC
- Indian Penal Code
- bail procedure
- Allahabad High Court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No.
- 8201 of 2026
Ramashray Yadav @ Ramashray Singh Yadav
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Another
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Satish Chandra Singh
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Ranjana Singh, Shesh Nath Singh
Yadav
Court No. - 72
HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J.
1. Heard Shri Satish Chandra Singh, learned counsel for the applicant,
Shri Shesh Nath Singh Yadav, learned counsel for the informant, learned
A.G.A. appearing for the State and perused the records.
2. The present application has been filed on behalf of the applicant in
Case Crime No. 73 of 2025, under Sections 191(2), 117(2), 115(2), 352,
351(3), 324(4), 110, 109(1) BNS, Police Station-Rampur Manjha, District
Gahzipur, with a prayer to grant him anticipatory bail.
3. After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicant prays that he
may be permitted to withdraw this application and move an appropriate
application seeking regular bail before the concerned Court. He prays that
a direction may be given to the concerned court to decide the bail
application expeditiously.
4. Learned AGA has no objection to the said prayer.
5. On the prayer made, it is provided that in case the applicant appears
before the concerned court and applies for bail within three weeks from
today, his application for bail shall be considered and disposed of
expeditiously in accordance with law.
6. However, For a period of three weeks from today, no coercive action
shall be taken against the applicant herein in pursuance of aforesaid case.
NABAIL No. 8201 of 2026
2
7. With these observations, the application is disposed of.
8. It is made clear that no further time shall be granted to comply with this
order.
(Vivek Kumar Singh,J.)
September 21, 2026
Nitendra
Digitally signed by :-
NITENDRA TIWARI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…