ANAND KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

         HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No.
                        - 8597 of 2025

Anand Kumar Singh
                                                                     .....Applicant(s)
                                       Versus

State of U.P.
                                                                           .....Opposite
                                                                                 Party(s)

Counsel for Applicant(s)      : Neelesh Ramchandani, Swetashwa
                                Agarwal
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Pankaj Kumar Mishra

Court No. - 72
                  HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J.

1. Heard Shri Swetashwa Agarwal, learned Senior Counsel assisted by
Shri Neelesh Ramchandani, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Pankaj
Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the informant and learned A.G.A. for
the State and perused the record.

2. The applicant-Anand Kumar Singh was granted interim anticipatory
bail in the present case by this Court vide order dated 03.11.2025. The
said order is quoted herein below:

     "1. Heard Sri Shwetashwa Agarwal along with Sri Neelesh Ramchandani,
     learned counsel for the applicant, Sri P.K. Mishra, learned counsel for
     the first informant and Sri U.S. Mishra, learned A.G.A. for the State and
     perused the record.

     2. The present application has been moved seeking anticipatory bail in
     Case Crime no. 0180 of 2024 under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 4171,
     504, 506 IPC, Police Station Civil Lines, District Etawah with the prayer
     that in the event of arrest, the applicant may be released on bail.

     3. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant that FIR has been
     lodged after delay of four years. It is also submitted that an FIR was
     lodged against the first informant in the State of Tripura in the year 2022
     against which, he approached the High Court Tripura for cancellation of
     the same but he moved to Hon'ble Supreme Court and the same was
                                                         NABAIL No. 8597 of 2025
                                 2


rejected and the FIR was registered the first informant. It is further
submitted that the present prosecution has been lodged as a counter blast
to the said case. It was also submitted that applicant undertakes to co-
operate during trial and he would appear as and when required by the
investigating agency or Court and in case he is granted anticipatory bail,
he shall not misuse the liberty of bail and would obey all conditions of
bail.

4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the first informant as well as
learned AGAS pray for some time to file counter affidavit.

5. Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and all
attending facts and circumstances of the case, let the applicant Anand
Kumar Singh in the event of his arrest, be released on interim
anticipatory bail on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with
two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court
concerned till 02nd December, 2025 with the following conditions :-

(i) The applicant shall not tamper with evidence and that he would
appear before the trial Court on the date fixed unless exempted by the
Court concerned;

(ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement,
threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so
as to dissuade him/her/them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to
any police officer;

(iii) The applicant would co-operate during trial and would not misuse
the liberty of bail.

(iv) The applicant shall not leave India without prior permission of the
Court concerned.

7. In default of any of the conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to
file appropriate application for cancellation of the interim anticipatory
bail granted to the applicant.

8. Put up this case as fresh on 02.12.2025. 9. In the meantime, opposite
parties may file counter affidavit. "
                                                                                           NABAIL No. 8597 of 2025
                                                                   3


                                    3. Earlier interim anticipatory bail was granted to the applicant vide order
                                    dated 03.11.2025 and in pursuance of aforesaid order, the applicant is
                                    regularly appearing before the learned trial court which is clear from
                                    perusal of order sheet appended in the supplementary affidavit dated
                                    31.08.2026.

                                    4. In view of above, the interim anticipatory bail granted to the applicant
                                    vide order dated 03.11.2025 is hereby made absolute. The applicant
                                    Anand Kumar Singh, will remain on anticipatory bail till conclusion of
                                    trial on the same terms and conditions as given in the order dated
                                    03.11.2025 passed by this Court.

                                    5. The anticipatory bail application stands allowed.

                                    6. In default or misuse of any of the conditions mentioned in the order
                                    dated 03.11.2025, the Public Prosecutor/ Investigating Officer/ first
                                    informant-complainant would be at liberty to file appropriate application
                                    for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the applicant, before the
                                    concerned court.



                                                                                      (Vivek Kumar Singh,J.)
                                    October 1, 2026
                                    Nitendra




Digitally signed by :-
NITENDRA TIWARI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad