Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

AAMIRversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Decided

Holding

The court held that an anticipatory bail application may be withdrawn by the applicant if the opposite party does not object.

Summary

Aamir filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, counsel for the applicant sought permission to withdraw the application, which the State's counsel did not oppose. The court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the application as withdrawn. It directed that if the applicant later appears before the trial court for bail, the application will be heard according to law. No substantive merits of the bail request were considered.

Issues considered

  • Whether an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 can be withdrawn by the applicant with the consent of the opposite party

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Section 482
  • withdrawal of application
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                                                HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                        CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No.
                                                                - 8894 of 2026

                                    Aamir
                                                                                                .....Applicant(s)
                                                                       Versus

                                    State of U.P. and Another
                                                                                                     .....Opposite
                                                                                                           Party(s)

                                    Counsel for Applicant(s)      : Amit Kumar Chauhan, Prakash Veer
                                                                    Tripathi
                                    Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

                                    Court No. - 67
                                                     HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J.

                                    1. Sri Prakash Veer Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Shiv
                                    Dutt Shukla, learned A.G.A. for the State-respondents are present.

                                    2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicant seeks permission
                                    to withdraw the present application.

                                    3. Learned AGA has no objection to the same.

                                    4. In view of above, the present application stands dismissed as withdrawn.

                                    5. If the applicant appears before the trial court and applies for bail, his
                                    application shall be heard and decided in accordance with law.



                                                                                    (Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.)
                                    September 8, 2026
                                    Madhurima




Digitally signed by :-
MADHURIMA GARG
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.