Allahabad High Court
MOHD SAMEERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
- Decided
- Bench
- JAI PRAKASH TIWARI
Holding
The anticipatory bail application was dismissed due to non-prosecution.
Summary
The applicant, Mohd Sameer, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Allahabad High Court under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. The court noted the absence of representation and considered the application to be non-prosecuted. Consequently, the bench dismissed the anticipatory bail application. The order was pronounced by Justice Jai Prakash Tiwari on May 5, 2026.
Issues considered
- Whether an anticipatory bail application can be entertained in the absence of counsel for the applicant
Legislation cited
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- Section 482
- non-prosecution
- High Court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No.
- 9031 of 2025
Mohd Sameer
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Another
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Neeraj Srivastava, Rayoof Ali
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 70
HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J.
1. List has been revised.
2. None appears on behalf of applicant to press the Anticipatory Bail
Application.
3. The application is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Jai Prakash Tiwari,J.)
May 5, 2026
SFH
Digitally signed by :-
SYED FAHIM HUSAIN
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…