Allahabad High Court
TANNU SINGH @ ROSHNI SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.
- Decided
- Bench
- VIVEK KUMAR SINGH
Holding
The court allowed the withdrawal of the anticipatory bail application and directed that a regular bail application be filed within three weeks, with no coercive action in the interim.
Summary
The applicant, Tannu Singh, was charged under several IPC sections in a criminal case and filed an anticipatory bail application under CrPC Section 482. After hearing, the applicant sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and instead file a regular bail application before the trial court. The State's counsel did not oppose this request. The High Court permitted the withdrawal, directing that the applicant file a regular bail application within three weeks, and ordered that no coercive action be taken against her during that period. The court emphasized that no further time would be granted beyond the stipulated three weeks and disposed of the anticipatory bail application.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the applicant under CrPC Section 482.
- Whether the applicant may withdraw the anticipatory bail application and seek regular bail.
Legislation cited
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482
- Indian Penal Code — s. 103(1), 115(2), 118(1), 191(2), 351(3), 352
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- regular bail
- withdrawal of application
- coercive action
- expeditious disposal
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No.
- 9584 of 2026
Tannu Singh @ Roshni Singh
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P.
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ram Pravesh Yadav, Shashank Kumar
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 72
HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. appearing
for the State and perused the records.
2. The present application has been filed on behalf of the applicant in
Case Crime No. 236 of 2026, under Sections 191(2), 103(1), 118(1),
115(2), 352, 351(3) BNS, Police Station Rasra, District Ballia with a
prayer to grant her anticipatory bail.
3. After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicant prays that he
may be permitted to withdraw this application and move an appropriate
application seeking regular bail before the concerned Court. He prays that
a direction may be given to the concerned Court to decide the bail
application expeditiously.
4. Learned AGA has no objection to the said prayer.
5. On the prayer made, it is provided that in case the applicant appears
before the concerned court and applies for bail within three weeks from
today, her application for bail shall be considered and disposed of
expeditiously in accordance with law.
6. For a period of three weeks from today or till filing of regular bail
application, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against
the applicant in the aforesaid case.
NABAIL No. 9584 of 2026
2
7. It is made clear that no further time shall be granted to comply with this
order.
8. With these observations, the application is disposed of.
(Vivek Kumar Singh,J.)
September 23, 2026
Lalit Shukla
Digitally signed by :-
LALIT KUMAR SHUKLA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…