Allahabad High Court
RAM MANOHARversusMOOL CHAND AND OTHERS
- Decided
- Bench
- ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL
Holding
The court allowed the withdrawal of the second appeal, thereby dismissing it as withdrawn.
Summary
The appellant filed a second appeal which was later sought to be withdrawn through an application supported by an affidavit of the appellant's son, Prem Narayan, who also represented other heirs. The court considered the request to withdraw the appeal. No substantive legal reasoning was detailed, and the court simply allowed the withdrawal application. Consequently, the second appeal was dismissed as withdrawn. The order was pronounced by Justice Rohit Ranjan Agarwal on September 9, 2026.
Issues considered
- Whether a second appeal may be withdrawn after filing
Subjects
- withdrawal of appeal
- second appeal
- civil procedure
- High Court of Allahabad
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
SECOND APPEAL No. - 677 of 1993
Ram Manohar
.....Appellant(s)
Versus
Mool Chand And Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Appellant(s) : A.N. Bhargava, Giridhary Lal
Choudhary, Jagat Narayan Mishra, Jai
Prakash Tripathi, R.C. Yadav, Ram
Prasad Dubey
Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ashok Gupta, Manish Chandra Tiwari,
Shashi Kant
Court No. - 9
HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
In Re: Civil Misc. Withdrawal Application No. 33 of 2026
1. By this application, which is supported by an affidavit of son of
appellant, Prem Narayan, who is also doing pairvi on behalf of other legal
heirs, a prayer has been made to dismiss this second appeal as withdrawn.
2. The withdrawal application is allowed.
In Re: Second Appeal
1. As the withdrawal application has already been allowed vide order of
date, the second appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.)
September 9, 2026
(V. S. SINGH)
Digitally signed by :-
VIDYA SAGAR SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…