Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SMT HUSNA BANOversusSRI ATIKUR REHMAN KHAN

Decided

Holding

The revision petition was dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

Smt. Husna Bano filed a revision petition against Sri Atikur Rehman Khan. The petition was presented before the Allahabad High Court, but the revisionist failed to appear or prosecute the petition. The court noted that no steps were taken to press the revision. Consequently, the revision was dismissed for want of prosecution, and any interim order that had been passed was vacated. No substantive merits of the dispute were examined.

Issues considered

  • What is the effect of a failure to prosecute a revision petition on its continuance?

Subjects

  • revision
  • want of prosecution
  • interim order vacated
  • civil procedure

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                          S.C.C. REVISION No. - 115 of 2024

                                    Smt Husna Bano
                                                                                               .....Revisionist(s)
                                                                           Versus

                                    Sri Atikur Rehman Khan
                                                                                                    .....Opposite
                                                                                                          Party(s)

                                    Counsel for Revisionist(s)    : Yogendra Kumar Srivastava
                                    Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Anadi Krishna Narayana, Neeharika
                                                                    Sinha Narayana

                                    Court No. - 35
                                            HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.

                                    Case called out in the revised list.

                                    None appears for the revisionist to press the revision.

                                    Revision is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.

                                    Interim order, if any, stands vacated.




                                                                             (Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.)
                                    September 11, 2026
                                    RKK/-




Digitally signed by :-
RAJ KUMAR KANNAUJIA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.