Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SMT PRAVESH CHAWLA AND 3 OTHERSversusSUNITA MARVAH AND ANOTHER

Decided

Holding

The revision petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

Smt Pravesh Chawla and three others filed a revision petition before the Allahabad High Court against Sunita Marvah and another. The petitioners' counsel, Akhtar Ali, did not present any substantive grounds or evidence for the revision. Consequently, the Court found that there was no prosecution of the revision petition. The Court dismissed the revision for want of prosecution and vacated any interim order that had been in force. No further relief was granted.

Issues considered

  • Whether a revision petition can be entertained in the absence of any prosecution or substantive material?

Subjects

  • revision
  • want of prosecution
  • interim order vacated

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                          S.C.C. REVISION No. - 141 of 2024

                                    Smt Pravesh Chawla And 3 Others
                                                                                               .....Revisionist(s)
                                                                           Versus

                                    Sunita Marvah And Another
                                                                                                    .....Opposite
                                                                                                          Party(s)

                                    Counsel for Revisionist(s)    : Akhtar Ali
                                    Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Ajay Kumar Singh, Ashish Kumar
                                                                    Singh

                                    Court No. - 35
                                            HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.

                                    Case called out in the revised list.

                                    None appears for the revisionists to press the revision.

                                    Revision is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.

                                    Interim order, if any, stands vacated.




                                                                             (Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.)
                                    September 11, 2026
                                    RKK/-




Digitally signed by :-
RAJ KUMAR KANNAUJIA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.