Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

CHINI KURAISHI AND 11 OTHERSversusWAQF MASZID ROTI WALAN

Decided

Holding

The revision petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

Chini Kuraishi and eleven other petitioners filed a revision application before the Allahabad High Court against Waqf Maszid Roti Walan. The petitioners were represented by counsel Tanzeel Ahmad and Yash Padia, while the opposite party was represented by Jawahir Yadav and Narendra Kumar. No petitioners appeared before the court to press the revision. The court observed that a revision petition must be prosecuted and, in the absence of any appearance or prosecution, it cannot be entertained. Consequently, the revision was dismissed for want of prosecution and the interim order that had been in force was vacated.

Issues considered

  • Whether the revision petition can be dismissed for want of prosecution?

Subjects

  • Revision
  • Procedural law
  • Waqf
  • Interim order vacated

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                          S.C.C. REVISION No. - 169 of 2024

                                    Chini Kuraishi And 11 Others
                                                                                                 .....Revisionist(s)
                                                                           Versus

                                    Waqf Maszid Roti Walan
                                                                                                      .....Opposite
                                                                                                            Party(s)

                                    Counsel for Revisionist(s)             :    Tanzeel Ahmad, Yash Padia
                                    Counsel for Opposite Party(s)          :    Jawahir Yadav, Narendra Kumar

                                    Court No. - 35
                                            HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.

                                    Case called out in the revised list.

                                    None appears for the revisionists to press the revision.

                                    Revision is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.

                                    Interim order, if any, stands vacated.




                                                                               (Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.)
                                    September 11, 2026
                                    RKK/-




Digitally signed by :-
RAJ KUMAR KANNAUJIA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.