Allahabad High Court
SMT. PREM LATAversusBABU SONKAR AND 4 OTHERS
- Decided
- Bench
- Y K SRIVASTAVA
Holding
The revision is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
Smt. Prem Lata filed a revision application (S.C.C. Revision No. 184 of 2022) before the Allahabad High Court challenging a decision of the lower court against Babu Sonkar and four others. The revisionist's counsel, Saurabh Kumar Pandey, appeared, but the opposite party's counsel, Shashi Kant Srivastava and Vikas Mathur, were present. No further appearance or prosecution was made by the revisionist. The Court observed that the revisionist failed to press the revision and therefore dismissed the application for want of prosecution. Consequently, any interim order that may have been in force was vacated.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate course of action when a revision application is not prosecuted by the applicant?
Subjects
- revision
- want of prosecution
- dismissal
- interim order vacated
- high court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
S.C.C. REVISION No. - 184 of 2022
Smt. Prem Lata
.....Revisionist(s)
Versus
Babu Sonkar And 4 Others
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Saurabh Kumar Pandey
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Shashi Kant Srivastava, Vikas Mathur
Court No. - 35
HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
Case called out in the revised list.
None appears for the revisionist to press the revision.
Sri Vikash Mathur, learned counsel for the respondents is present.
Revision is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.)
April 20, 2026
RKK/-
Digitally signed by :-
RAJ KUMAR KANNAUJIA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…