Allahabad High Court
RAVINDRA KUMAR JAISWALversusCHANDRA KISHOR JAISWAL
- Decided
- Bench
- Y K SRIVASTAVA
Holding
The transfer application was dismissed for want of prosecution and the interim order was vacated.
Summary
The revisionist, Ravindra Kumar Jaiswal, filed a transfer application before the Allahabad High Court. No representative appeared on behalf of the revisionist to pursue the application. The opposite party, represented by counsel, was present. The Court dismissed the transfer application for want of prosecution and consequently vacated any interim order previously granted. The matter was concluded without further hearing.
Issues considered
- Whether a transfer application can proceed in the absence of prosecution by the applicant
- Whether an interim order previously granted should remain in force when the application is dismissed
Subjects
- transfer of suit
- revision
- want of prosecution
- interim order vacated
- high court procedure
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
S.C.C. REVISION No. - 88 of 2025
Ravindra Kumar Jaiswal
.....Revisionist(s)
Versus
Chandra Kishor Jaiswal
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Devendra Kumar Yadav, Gautam
Kumar Banerji, Sanjay Sharma, Shaili
Ganguly, Snehlata Sharma
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Vinayak Mithal, Vinod Kumar
Court No. - 35
HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
Case called out in the revised list.
No one appeared on behalf of the applicant to press this transfer
application.
Sri Rishabh Agrawal, learned Advocate holding brief of Sri Vinayak
Mithal, counsel appearing for the opposite party is present.
The transfer application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, granted earlier, stands vacated.
(Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.)
May 7, 2026
Neetu
Digitally signed by :-
NEETU SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…