Allahabad High Court
WASEEM KHAN ALIAS PAPPU KHAN AND 18 OTHERSversusDR. SUDHA RANI AND 10 OTHERS
- Decided
- Bench
- Y K SRIVASTAVA
Holding
The revision is dismissed as the delay condonation application was rejected for want of prosecution.
Summary
The revisionist filed a revision seeking condonation of delay in an application (No. 343830 of 2017). The court noted that no counsel appeared to press the application on behalf of the revisionist. The opposite party's counsel was present. Since the revisionist failed to prosecute the application, the court rejected the delay condonation application for want of prosecution. Consequently, the revision was dismissed. The judgment was delivered by Justice Yogendra Kumar Srivastava on September 15, 2026.
Issues considered
- Whether a delay condonation application can be entertained when the applicant fails to appear or prosecute the case.
Subjects
- revision
- delay condonation
- procedural default
- civil procedure
- court dismissal
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
S.C.C. REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 115 of 2017
Waseem Khan Alias Pappu Khan And 18 Others
.....Revisionist(s)
Versus
Dr. Sudha Rani And 10 Others
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Gulrez Khan, Javed Husain Khan, Sr.
Advocate
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Rama Goel Bansal
Court No. - 35
HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
(Re: Delay Condonation Application No.343830 of 2017)
Case called out in the revised list.
None appears for the applicant-revisionist to press the application.
Ms Tanu Shree Agarwal, holding brief of Ms Rama Goel Bansal, learned
counsel appearing for the opposite parties is present.
Delay condonation application is, accordingly, rejected for want of
prosecution.
Consequently, the revision stands dismissed.
(Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.)
September 15, 2026
RKK/-
Digitally signed by :-
RAJ KUMAR KANNAUJIA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…