Allahabad High Court
PAWAN KUMAR JAINversusRAMESH CHANDRA GUPTA
- Decided
- Bench
- Y K SRIVASTAVA
Holding
A revision petition cannot be entertained where there is no prosecution.
Summary
A revision petition was filed by Pawan Kumar Jain against Ramesh Chandra Gupta. The petitioners were represented by counsel Adarsh Bhushan and R.K. Singh Gaharwar, while the opposite party was represented by Chandra Bhan Gupta. No substantive material or prosecution was presented by the petitioners to support the revision. The court observed that there was no basis for the revision to proceed. Consequently, the revision was dismissed for want of prosecution and the interim order, if any, was vacated.
Issues considered
- Whether a revision petition can be entertained in the absence of any prosecution or substantive material.
Subjects
- revision
- prosecution
- interim order
- vacated
- procedural dismissal
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
S.C.C. REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 152 of 2017
Pawan Kumar Jain
.....Revisionist(s)
Versus
Ramesh Chandra Gupta
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Adarsh Bhushan, R.K Singh Gaharwar
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Chandra Bhan Gupta
Court No. - 35
HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
Case called out in the revised list.
None appears for the revisionist to press the revision.
Sri Harsh Gupta, holding brief of Sri Chandra Bhan Gupta, learned
counsel appearing for the opposite party is present.
Revision is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.)
September 15, 2026
RKK/-
Digitally signed by :-
RAJ KUMAR KANNAUJIA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…